Index by Year : Byrd's Eye View Archive

1961 1962 1963 1964 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

In Behalf of Public Broadcasting

Published March 1995 Download PDF of the original newspaper column

Byrd's-Eye View By U.S. Senator Robert C. Byrd In Behalf of Public Broadcasting

It is unfortunate that, under the guise of budget economy, some in Congress have taken advantage of current debate on reducing the federal budget deficits to suggest the dismantling of the Public Broadcasting System (PBS), one of our nation's cultural gems.

Since the early years of television, thoughtful people have sought alternatives to the trash and vulgarity that have increasingly contaminated the television airwaves.

In time, "educational television" laid the foundations for today's public broadcasting stations.

Consequently, as the public television network grew, children in our inner cities and in rural states like West Virginia could be reached by television images that stretched their imaginations, taught them stories by great authors, exposed them to initial concepts in science and arithmetic, and challenged them with mainstream values such as telling the truth, respecting other children, obeying their parents, and becoming good citizens.

The Public Broadcasting System, the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, and National Public Radio have increasingly filled the voids left by the commercial networks when those networks appeared to turn their backs on good music, drama, public debates, documentaries, and substance and challenge in entertainment.

Indeed, the Public Broadcasting System has evolved into a kind of cultural cutting edge - the pioneering network - that carved the frontiers and plowed the first fields that have provided the market that several other culturally oriented stations are now exploiting.

Lamentably, in commercial television, the bottom line is profit, and until certain kinds of programming prove themselves, most commercial networks are unwilling to take risks on most types of programming — that is, until public television demonstrates the existence of a market for that kind of programming.

I hope that we will think long and sincerely before we punish, dismantle, or destroy one of the most valuable assets in our national cultural treasury, and risk reducing the Public Broadcasting System, the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, and National Public Radio to bad and ineffectual imitations of our commercial broadcasting networks.

To stifle, shut down, starve, emasculate, or cripple our Public Broadcasting System, by denying it the seed money that guarantees its very survival in some of our most isolated rural communities, would be to kill one of the finest golden-egg-laying geese on the American cultural scene.

March 8, 1995

March 8, 1995

‹‹ Return to column index for 1995